Start with Why

Introduction: Why Start with Why?

Overview

Simon Sinek opens this seminal work by inviting us into a world where inspiration isn't a rare gift but a learnable pattern. He positions the book not as a fix for what's broken, but as a guide to amplify what already works—the natural ability some have to inspire action. Through vivid storytelling and clear contrasts, he introduces the core premise: truly influential leaders and organizations think, act, and communicate from the inside out, beginning with a clear sense of Why. This introduction sets the stage for understanding how this approach can transform leadership, business, and even societal change.

The Pattern of Inspiration

At the heart of the chapter is the observation that a distinct pattern separates those who merely lead from those who inspire. Sinek argues that inspiring entities—whether individuals like Martin Luther King Jr. or companies like Apple—all operate from a deep-rooted sense of purpose. This isn't about manipulation or external incentives; it's about communicating a belief that resonates on a personal level, creating followers who act because they want to, not because they have to. The pattern is consistent across all spheres, suggesting it's a fundamental principle of human behavior.

Contrasting Examples: The Wright Brothers and Langley

To illustrate this pattern, Sinek presents a compelling historical juxtaposition. Samuel Pierpont Langley, with his elite credentials, powerful connections, and substantial funding, seemed destined to achieve manned flight first. In contrast, Wilbur and Orville Wright had no money, no formal advanced education, and only a dedicated team in their bicycle shop. Yet, it was the Wright brothers who succeeded. The difference, Sinek explains, wasn't in capability or resources but in approach. The Wright brothers' deep Why—their passionate belief in the possibility of flight—inspired their team and drove their innovation, while Langley was primarily motivated by the reward of success and recognition.

Modern Revolutionaries: Apple's Founding

The narrative then shifts to a modern example. During the personal computer revolution, many players had smart ideas and business acumen. However, Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak founded Apple with a clear sense of purpose: to challenge the status quo and empower the individual. Wozniak's vision was to level the playing field, and Jobs's drive was to "put a dent in the world." This shared Why allowed Apple to inspire loyalty and repeat innovation across multiple industries, not just by selling products but by championing a cause. Their success wasn't due to being the only ones with a good product, but the ones who could consistently inspire.

The Movement Leader: Martin Luther King Jr.

Sinek further solidifies his argument with the example of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. In the civil rights movement, many shared the goal of equality and were charismatic speakers. But Dr. King had a unique ability to articulate a dream that inspired a quarter of a million people from diverse backgrounds to gather peacefully in Washington. He provided a clear sense of Why—a belief in a better future for all—that transformed personal conviction into a collective movement. His leadership demonstrates how a clear purpose can mobilize masses for profound change.

Motivation vs. Inspiration

A key distinction drawn in this chapter is between motivating and inspiring. Motivation, Sinek notes, is often tied to external factors like incentives or threats—it can drive behavior, as seen with General Motors' sales dominance for decades. Inspiration, however, comes from within. Inspired action is deeply personal; people follow because the cause aligns with their own beliefs, often enduring inconvenience or paying a premium. This distinction explains why inspired organizations enjoy disproportionate loyalty, innovation, and long-term sustainability.

The Broader Vision and Call to Action

Sinek concludes the introduction by painting a hopeful vision of a world where the ability to inspire is widespread. He links inspired leadership to higher job satisfaction, which in turn fosters more productive, creative, and happier societies. The chapter ends with a direct challenge to the reader: to adopt a new mindset. The book's goal is not to prescribe specific actions but to explore the cause of action. By starting with Why, we can all learn to lead and build organizations grounded in trust and loyalty.

Key Takeaways

• True leadership is about inspiration, not just motivation. Inspired followers act from a personal sense of purpose, not external rewards.
• A consistent, learnable pattern separates inspiring leaders and organizations: they all think, act, and communicate from the inside out, beginning with a clear Why.
• Historical and modern examples—from the Wright brothers to Apple to Martin Luther King Jr.—demonstrate that success driven by purpose outperforms success driven by resources or incentives alone.
• Embracing this "Start with Why" philosophy has the potential to transform not only businesses but also employee well-being and societal health, creating a world where the majority love their work.

Download Mindmap

If you like this summary, you probably also like these summaries...

Hustle Harder, Hustle Smarter

by 50 Cent

The Almanack of Naval Ravikant

by Eric Jorgenson

The Diary of a CEO

by Steven Bartlett

Start with Why

Chapter 1: We Assume We Know

Overview

This chapter opens by establishing a core human tendency that shapes our decisions, actions, and understanding of the world: we operate based on assumptions, often believing we know more than we actually do. Using a striking historical anecdote and a powerful business metaphor, it argues that this reliance on incomplete or incorrect perceived truths is a fundamental flaw in our decision-making processes, whether in life, leadership, or building organizations. The chapter sets the stage for the book's central premise by illustrating the limitations of simply gathering more data and the superior power of starting from a clear, intentional foundation.

The Power and Peril of Assumptions

The chapter begins with a compelling riddle describing a leader's inauguration: a 43-year-old man, sworn in on a cold January day with a famed war-general predecessor, celebrating with long parades. Most listeners confidently assume it's John F. Kennedy—until the reveal of the date, January 30, 1933, identifies the figure as Adolf Hitler. This demonstrates how a single piece of missing information (the date) can completely invert our understanding. The author extends this idea to historical beliefs, like the pervasive idea that the world was flat, which stifled exploration until the correction of that assumption unleashed a new era of globalization and discovery. The point is that our behaviors and decisions are driven by these "perceived truths," which are not always accurate.

The Limits of Data-Driven Decisions

The narrative then examines how this plays out in our pursuit of goals and success. We gather data through research, advice, and experience to make "educated decisions," yet outcomes can still be wrong, sometimes catastrophically so. Conversely, when things go right, we often misattribute the cause (like an investor crediting skill for wins but blaming luck for losses). The chapter posits that simply seeking more information is an insufficient solution, especially if the entire process is built on a flawed initial assumption. It acknowledges the dance between rational analysis and gut instinct but concludes that neither method reliably produces repeatable, desirable outcomes on its own.

The Car Door Metaphor: Manipulation vs. Design

A pivotal story clarifies the alternative. American car executives visiting a Japanese plant note that, unlike in U.S. factories, no worker uses a rubber mallet to tap car doors into perfect alignment. When asked how they ensure a perfect fit, the Japanese guides reply, "We make sure it fits when we design it." The Americans were focused on correcting the problem (hammering the door) at the end of the process, while the Japanese engineered the desired outcome from the very beginning. The author presents this as a central metaphor for leadership and strategy: many organizations use short-term "mallets" (tactics, manipulations, pressure) to hammer results into place, while truly effective ones design systems and make decisions from the start that inherently yield the right outcome. The results may look similar in the short term, but only the latter approach creates structurally sound, sustainable, and repeatable long-term success.

Download Mindmap

Start with Why

Chapter 2: Carrots and Sticks

Overview

It begins by questioning the very premise of how most businesses think about success, suggesting that in a world of parity, fleeting advantages like price or features force leaders onto one of two fundamental paths: manipulation or inspiration. The chapter then unpacks the pervasive and often tempting toolkit of manipulations, from the short-term high of price drops and promotions to the primal pull of fear and the empty promise of aspirations. It explores the modern twist of social pressure through influencers and reveals how companies often chase novelty—mistaking minor feature updates for true, lasting change.

The discussion pivots by contrasting this with real innovation, using the stark difference between Motorola’s RAZR and Apple’s iPhone to illustrate how genuine change reshapes industries and power dynamics, rather than just offering a temporary sales bump. This leads to a crucial distinction: while manipulations are effective at driving transactions, they are utterly incapable of building loyalty. True loyalty, the kind that provides resilience in a crisis, comes from a different, more meaningful place.

The analysis reveals the heavy toll of a system built on carrots and sticks. For consumers, it creates paralyzing choice and anxiety; for corporations, it triggers an exhausting and costly arms race. This stress tax affects everyone’s well-being. Most dangerously, the short-term effectiveness of manipulations makes them addictive, trapping industries and leaders in a downward spiral where the pursuit of quick wins—as seen in the 2008 financial crisis—erodes long-term health and stability. The underlying message is clear: a strategy rooted solely in transaction is a path to failure, setting the stage for the alternative of building from a clear sense of purpose.

The Flawed Foundation of Business Decisions

The chapter opens by challenging a common business assumption: that customers choose a product based on superior quality, features, price, or service. In a market where competitors quickly match each other, these advantages are fleeting. The sobering conclusion is that most companies have no real understanding of why their customers are loyal or why their employees stay. This ignorance forces them to operate on flawed assumptions, leaving only two fundamental paths to influence behavior: manipulation or inspiration.

The Mechanics of Manipulation

Manipulation is presented as a common, often effective, and sometimes benign tactic. It's a tool we've all used, like a child promising friendship for candy. In business, when the core "why" is missing, companies disproportionately rely on a toolkit of manipulations to drive sales, loyalty, and decisions.

Price Dropping prices is a highly effective, drug-like manipulation. It guarantees short-term sales but traps companies in a destructive cycle. As margins shrink, the pressure to cut costs or sell more intensifies, often leading to a race to the bottom that transforms products into mere commodities. While Walmart scaled this model, it came at a high cost to its reputation through various cost-cutting scandals. The central question becomes: how much are you willing to pay for the money you make?

Promotions Using incentives like cash-back offers or "two-for-one" deals is a standard way to tip the scales when products are otherwise equal. However, as General Motors discovered, promotions can erode profit margins and create dependency—"No cash, no customers." The chapter introduces the industry concepts of "breakage" (profit from unused gift cards or vouchers) and "inertia" (profit from forgotten subscriptions). These are built-in manipulations that punish customer inaction, with companies like Fabletics exemplifying how difficult cancellation processes can turn promotions into profitable traps.

Fear As the most powerful manipulation, fear bypasses logic by tapping into our survival instinct. In business, it manifests as the "safe choice" (like the old adage "No one ever got fired for buying IBM") or in marketing that agitates insecurities about health, safety, or missing out. Whether it's a public service announcement about drugs or an insurance ad, the mechanism is the same: influence behavior by introducing a perceived threat.

Aspirations This manipulation tempts us toward a desirable ideal, such as finding love, getting rich, or achieving a better physique. It's most effective on those who lack the discipline to achieve these goals on their own, leading to short-term spikes in behavior (like January gym memberships) without fostering lasting change. The corporate parallel is the pursuit of "quick-fix" consulting solutions over sustainable, long-term strategies.

Social Pressure The tactic of using experts, majority opinions, or celebrities to validate a choice exploits our fear of being wrong or left out. While classic endorsements (like Gatorade's "Be Like Mike") leverage aspirational figures, the modern era has birthed the "influencer"—a new type of celebrity who is the product. The scale is immense, with top influencers garnering hundreds of millions of views, and studies show a vast majority of young people now aspire to wield this form of social pressure themselves.

Novelty (Mislabeled as Innovation) Here, companies mistake superficial new features for genuine innovation. Motorola's RAZR phone and Colgate's explosion of toothpaste varieties (41 types) are prime examples. Novelty provides a temporary sales bump but forces a company onto a hamster wheel of constant, minor updates. This "feature race" confuses consumers and dilutes the brand, whereas true innovation—like Edison's lightbulb or Netflix's streaming model—changes industries and societies.

Beyond Novelty: The Real Shift in Power

The chapter contrasts Motorola's RAZR, a phone celebrated for its novel features like a thin design and metal case, with Apple's iPhone. While the RAZR drove temporary sales through novelty, it was the iPhone that enacted a profound, lasting change. Apple's key innovation wasn't just the touchscreen; it was fundamentally altering the industry's power structure. Before the iPhone, wireless carriers dictated phone features to manufacturers. Apple inverted this relationship, demanding control over the user experience and partnering exclusively with AT&T. This move placed consumer electronics companies—and ultimately, the consumer—at the center of design, paving the way for ecosystem innovations like third-party app stores.

Manipulations Lead to Transactions, Not Loyalty

Tactics like police rewards or lost-pet posters are effective for one-time transactions but fail to foster lasting relationships. This transactional approach is rampant in politics, where attack ads and single-issue campaigns may win elections but breed voter cynicism, not loyalty. In business, there's a critical distinction between repeat business and loyalty. Repeat business is secured through ongoing manipulations—promotions, discounts, ads. Loyalty, however, is when a customer consciously chooses you over a better or cheaper alternative. The American auto industry has repeatedly suffered from relying on costly incentives to drive sales; when market conditions shifted, as during oil crises, this strategy collapsed. True loyalty, as demonstrated by customers supporting Southwest Airlines after 9/11, provides resilience that manipulations can never buy.

The Stress Tax of a Manipulative Marketplace

An overreliance on carrots and sticks creates a vicious cycle of stress for everyone. Consumers face paralyzing choice overload in everything from toothpaste to major life decisions, bombarded by competing messages. Companies, in turn, are locked in a exhausting arms race of new promotions and features just to stand out, eroding profit margins and internal well-being. Citing Dr. Peter Whybrow's American Mania, the chapter argues that the corporate pursuit of "more, more, more" overloads our brain's reward circuits, contributing to widespread health issues like anxiety and depression. In a system run on manipulations, both buyers and sellers lose.

The Addictive Downward Spiral

The most insidious danger of manipulations is that they are effective, making them the default strategy across industries. This creates a systemic trap where leaders, like addicts seeking a fix, chase short-term highs at the expense of long-term health. The 2008 financial crisis is presented as a catastrophic example: manipulations in the form of reckless bonuses, suppressed dissent, and easy loans fueled a bubble. When it burst, the absence of any loyal foundation—to the institution, the customer, or a greater cause—led to collapse. This pattern, seen also in the historic struggles of American carmakers, shows that a strategy built solely on transactions is ultimately a path to failure.

Key Takeaways

• Novelty is not innovation. Real, category-redefining change alters systems and power dynamics, as Apple did, not just adds features.
• Manipulations drive transactions; inspiration builds loyalty. Loyalty is a conscious choice to stick with a brand despite alternatives, and it provides invaluable resilience in tough times.
• A marketplace saturated with manipulations creates systemic stress for consumers and corporations alike, with tangible costs to mental and physical health.
• The short-term effectiveness of manipulations is addictive and dangerous. It leads to a cycle of declining organizational health, as evidenced by major economic crises, because it cultivates transactions, not partnerships.

Download Mindmap

If you like this summary, you probably also like these summaries...

Hustle Harder, Hustle Smarter

by 50 Cent

The Almanack of Naval Ravikant

by Eric Jorgenson

The Diary of a CEO

by Steven Bartlett

Start with Why

Chapter 3: The Golden Circle

Overview

At its core, this chapter introduces The Golden Circle, a powerful model that explains how some leaders and organizations consistently inspire while others merely manipulate to achieve results. It all comes down to a simple, three-layer framework: WHAT, HOW, and WHY. While everyone knows what they do and some know how they do it, very few can clearly articulate why they do it—their purpose, cause, or belief. This hierarchy forms the blueprint for human behavior.

Most companies communicate from the outside in, starting with WHAT they do and hoping it leads to a sale. This approach relies on manipulation, using features and benefits to make a rational case. Inspired leaders and organizations, however, flip the script entirely. They think, act, and communicate from the inside out, starting with their WHY. This fundamental shift transforms their message. When Apple communicates, it doesn’t lead with computers; it leads with a belief in challenging the status quo. The products then become the tangible proof of that belief. This illustrates the chapter’s pivotal insight: people don't buy WHAT you do; they buy WHY you do it.

Clarity of WHY provides immense strategic freedom. A company defined by its purpose, like Apple, can move into entirely new product categories because its loyal followers understand the cause, not just the product. Conversely, companies defined by their WHAT, like many of Apple’s competitors, find themselves trapped in their "core business," unable to expand because customers see them only as a computer company. When an organization loses sight of its WHY and competes only on WHAT—price, features, service—it falls into the stressful and unsustainable commodity trap.

This principle extends far beyond product marketing. The chapter clarifies that Apple’s success isn’t about selling a lifestyle or having objectively "better" products; it’s about attracting people who already share the company’s underlying beliefs. This explains the often-fruitless debates between Apple and PC users—each side is right for their own WHY. The real cost comes when an organization’s WHY becomes fuzzy. Without a clear purpose to inspire, companies default to manipulative tactics that work in the short term but erode long-term loyalty and innovation.

The powerful, cautionary tale of the railroads drives this point home. In their heyday, these companies defined themselves by their WHAT—the railroad business. When the airplane emerged, they saw it as a threat, not as another way to fulfill their potential WHY of mass transportation. Their failure to adapt led to decline. The chapter warns that many modern industries—music, publishing, media—are today’s railroads, facing disruption because they’ve forgotten the cause they originally served.

Ultimately, the path to lasting success and adaptation isn’t found by frantically asking, "What should we do?" The critical question is, "Why did we start doing what we’re doing in the first place?" Reconnecting with that original WHY provides a stable compass, allowing any organization to navigate change, evaluate new technologies, and find fresh ways to bring its cause to life.

The Pattern of Inspiration vs. Manipulation

The chapter opens by observing a distinct group of leaders and organizations that achieve outsized influence by choosing to inspire people rather than manipulate them. These inspiring entities all think, act, and communicate in the same, counterintuitive way: from the inside out. This method is based on a naturally occurring pattern termed The Golden Circle, inspired by the mathematical beauty and predictable order of the golden ratio found in nature. Just as the golden ratio reveals order in apparent chaos, The Golden Circle uncovers order and predictability in human behavior, explaining why we do what we do.

This model provides a clear alternative to conventional wisdom, explaining phenomena like Apple’s cross-industry innovation, the cult-like loyalty of Harley-Davidson owners, the sustained profitability of Southwest Airlines, and the followings of historic figures like Martin Luther King Jr. and John F. Kennedy. The Golden Circle isn't just for grand visions; it has practical applications for leadership, culture, hiring, product development, and marketing, ultimately affecting employee engagement and customer loyalty. The core principle is that everything starts from the inside out—it all starts with Why.

Defining The Golden Circle: WHAT, HOW, WHY

To apply this model, the chapter defines its three concentric layers, moving from the outside in:

• WHAT: This is the simplest layer. Every individual and organization knows what they do—the products they sell, the services they offer, or the job they perform. These are easy to identify.
• HOW: Some know how they do what they do. These are often described as differentiating value propositions, unique processes, or strengths. They explain how something is different or better, but they are not enough on their own to inspire action.
• WHY: This is the innermost and most crucial layer. Very few can clearly articulate why they do what they do. Here, why does not mean “to make a profit” (a result), but rather refers to one’s purpose, cause, or belief. Why does the organization exist? Why should anyone care?

The "Normal" Pattern of Communication

Most individuals and organizations operate and communicate from the outside in, moving from the clearest thing (WHAT) to the fuzziest (WHY). A typical, uninspired marketing message follows this pattern:

1. WHAT: "We make great computers."
2. HOW: "They're beautifully designed, simple to use, and user-friendly."
3. Call to Action: "Wanna buy one?"

This outside-in pattern is the norm across business, law, and politics, organized to convince someone of a difference or superior value. It is an attempt to manipulate behavior through rational argument.

The Inside-Out Philosophy of Inspired Leaders

In contrast, every inspired leader and organization, like Apple, thinks, acts, and communicates from the inside out. They start with WHY. Rewriting the Apple example in this order transforms the message:

1. WHY: "In everything we do, we believe in challenging the status quo. We believe in thinking differently."
2. HOW: "The way we challenge the status quo is by making our products beautifully designed, simple to use, and user-friendly."
3. WHAT: "And we happen to make great computers. Wanna buy one?"

This reversed order feels fundamentally different and is more compelling. The WHAT (the products) no longer serves as the primary reason to buy; it becomes the tangible proof of the WHY. The design and user interface (the HOW) help make the cause rational and real.

People Don't Buy WHAT You Do, They Buy WHY You Do It

This is the chapter's central, repeatable insight. Companies typically use tangible features and benefits (WHAT and HOW) to build a rational case for why they are better. However, people make decisions based on the deeper sense of purpose (WHY). When communicating from the inside out, the WHY is offered as the true reason to buy, and the WHATs serve as the evidence to rationalize that feeling.

The chapter argues that, on a practical level, there is no structural difference between Apple and its competitors (Dell, HP, etc.). They all have access to the same resources, talent, and media. Apple’s disproportionate success, innovation, and loyal following stem from this clarity of WHY. Their products give life to their cause of challenging the status quo and empowering the individual, a pattern evident from the Macintosh to the iPod and iTunes.

The Freedom and Limitation of Definition

A company's self-definition dictates its flexibility. Apple defined itself by its WHY (challenging the status quo), not by its WHAT (making computers). This philosophical clarity, later reflected in their name change from Apple Computer, Inc. to Apple Inc., allowed them to move seamlessly into phones, music players, and watches. Consumers understood why Apple existed, regardless of the product.

In stark contrast, competitors like Gateway (with TVs) and Dell (with PDAs and MP3 players) failed in new markets because they were defined by WHAT they did. They were seen as computer companies, and it "didn’t feel right" to buy other products from them. They were stuck in their "core business."

The Commodity Trap

When a company loses sight of its WHY and defines itself solely by WHAT it does, it essentially becomes a commodity. Competition then devolves into battles over price, quality, service, and features—a stressful and expensive cycle that is hard to sustain. The milk industry is used as an example: all milk is lumped together as a commodity because the differences in WHAT are minor and not driven by a clear WHY.

Companies with a clear sense of WHY never wake up trying to figure out how to differentiate. They are inherently different, and everyone knows it. They don’t need manipulation; they inspire.

Dispelling Common Misconceptions

The chapter concludes this section by addressing two common but incorrect explanations for Apple’s success:

1. "Apple sells a lifestyle": This is a misreading. Apple doesn’t sell a lifestyle; it is a brand that people who already embody a certain lifestyle (one aligned with challenging the status quo) are drawn to. The product serves as proof of the individual’s own WHY.
2. "Apple simply has the best products": While product quality is important (a bad product will fail regardless of WHY), the concept of "better" is subjective and depends on the standard set by one’s WHY. A Ferrari isn’t objectively better than a minivan; it’s better for someone whose WHY aligns with performance and prestige. For those who share Apple’s beliefs, Apple products are objectively better, making rational arguments about specs with non-believers pointless. The visceral draw starts with WHY.

Beyond Debate: Establishing WHYs for Different Needs

The endless arguments between Apple and PC users often get stuck at the level of features and benefits, with each side trying to prove they're right. But what if both are right? It's not about which is objectively better; it's about which one aligns with an individual's specific needs and values. This shift in perspective only becomes possible when we first understand the underlying WHY for each option. Establishing that core purpose transforms a divisive debate into a meaningful discussion about personal fit and belief.

The Cost of a Fuzzy WHY

Clarity of purpose isn't the only path to success, but it is the essential ingredient for sustaining that success over the long haul. It fuels consistent innovation and organizational agility. When a company's WHY becomes unclear or forgotten, growth stalls, loyalty fades, and inspiration dries up. In that void, manipulation—using tactics like price drops or promotions—becomes the default strategy to drive behavior. These tactics work in the short term but erode trust and value over time, creating a fragile foundation for the business.

The Railroads: A Cautionary Tale

History offers a stark lesson in what happens when WHY goes fuzzy. In the late 1800s, railroad companies were titans of industry. After achieving monumental success, they lost connection with their original cause and became obsessed with the WHAT—they believed they were in the "railroad business." This narrow self-definition guided all their investments into tracks and engines. When the airplane emerged, they saw it as a threat unrelated to their business, rather than as another form of fulfilling their potential purpose: long-distance, mass transportation. That failure to adapt led to their eventual decline. They might have owned the airlines today had they remembered why they started.

Modern-Day Railroads: Industries at a Crossroads

This pattern isn't confined to history. We see the same dynamic playing out in contemporary industries that defined themselves by their products or methods, not their cause. The music industry, for instance, clung to the WHAT of selling physical CDs and struggled to adapt to digital behavior, leaving an opening for a company like Apple to create iTunes. Similar cracks are evident in publishing, newspapers, film, and television. These are today's railroads, watching customers drift to companies from other sectors because they've lost sight of the fundamental need they originally set out to serve.

Returning to the WHY for Adaptation

The way forward for any organization feeling disrupted isn't to frantically ask, "WHAT should we do to compete?" The more powerful question is, "WHY did we start doing WHAT we're doing in the first place?" Reconnecting with that original cause or belief provides a stable compass. It allows a company to evaluate all current technologies and market opportunities through the lens of how best to bring that cause to life now. This isn't mere opinion; as the chapter notes, this principle is deeply rooted in the patterns of human biology and behavior.

Key Takeaways

• Successful differentiation isn't about proving one option universally "better," but about understanding the specific WHY it serves for different people.
• A clear, inspiring WHY is the cornerstone of lasting success, fostering innovation and loyalty. Without it, companies resort to manipulative tactics that undermine long-term health.
• Defining yourself by WHAT you do (e.g., "we're in the railroad business") makes you vulnerable to disruption. Defining yourself by your WHY (e.g., "we're in the mass-transportation business") opens up adaptive possibilities.
• Industries facing technological disruption, from music to media, are often suffering from a fuzzy WHY. Their path to renewal lies in revisiting their original purpose.
• The critical strategic question shifts from "What should we do?" to "How can we best manifest our WHY with the tools available today?"

Download Mindmap

If you like this summary, you probably also like these summaries...

Hustle Harder, Hustle Smarter

by 50 Cent

The Almanack of Naval Ravikant

by Eric Jorgenson

The Diary of a CEO

by Steven Bartlett